Definition: How he entered into the house of God, and did eat the shewbread, which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for them which were with him, but only for the priests?
Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from Matthew 12:4. It’s a really interesting and somewhat mysterious verse in the Bible! Here's an explanation in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: Jesus is saying that he was completely free to eat bread made of our God, which we call “the shewbread.” This bread wasn’t normal or allowed. It was a special, symbolic piece of bread that only priests and Levites were permitted to partake of. Let's unpack it: “How he entered into the house of God…” : This means Jesus was entering into a place of holiness – a space where God is present. “…and did eat the shewbread…” : He actually ate this bread! It’s a key part of the story. “which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for them which were with him…” : This is important. The shewbread wasn't meant to be eaten by anyone but those designated as priests and Levites. It was a special offering that symbolized something holy. “…but only for the priests?” : This clarifies – it was only permitted for the priests, who were chosen to represent God on Earth. What's the Significance? This story is often interpreted as a symbolic representation of Jesus’ role in the church. It suggests: Jesus was uniquely connected to God: He wasn’t just any man; he had a special relationship with God, and that connection was made possible through his unique position within the church. His authority comes from God: The fact that he was allowed to eat this bread signifies that his authority and power are rooted in God himself – not in human laws or tradition. It’s a bit of a puzzle! The exact meaning has been debated for centuries, but it's generally understood as a powerful statement about Jesus’ divine nature and his unique role within the Christian faith. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Give you some context around this passage (like its historical setting)? Discuss a possible interpretation of this story?